Beyond the Ballot Box: The Institutional Cracks That Precede Democratic Collapse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58840/k2pw8r62Keywords:
Democratic Erosion, Institutional Resilience, Executive Overreach, Judicial Independence, Electoral Manipulation, Civil Society, Qualitative Research, Comparative Politics.Abstract
This study investigates the underlying institutional vulnerabilities that contribute to democratic backsliding, with a focus on processes that precede formal democratic collapse. While elections remain a central component of democratic systems, this research argues that democracy is sustained by a broader ecosystem of institutions and norms—many of which are quietly eroded through legal and procedural manipulation. Using a qualitative methodology based on secondary data analysis, the study examines six recurring themes across multiple countries: judicial independence erosion, executive aggrandizement, media and civil society suppression, electoral manipulation, international authoritarian influence, and institutional resilience. Findings reveal that democratic erosion is often subtle and incremental, driven by elected leaders who exploit institutional gaps to consolidate power. However, the study also identifies instances of resistance, particularly in the form of judicial pushback, legislative oversight, investigative journalism, and public mobilization. The analysis underscores the importance of institutional resilience and the critical role of non-electoral mechanisms in safeguarding democracy. The study concludes with practical recommendations for policymakers and civil society actors, highlighting the need for early-warning systems, civic education, legal protections for democratic institutions, and global cooperation in defending liberal democracy. It also calls for future research into digital authoritarianism, regional variations in norm erosion, and the long-term effectiveness of resistance mechanisms.